AI RED TEAMING

Find the failures before your users

Most enterprise AI systems are tested with a limited set of manual cases. BeyondGuard runs thousands of adversarial attacks against your LLM applications, agents, RAG pipelines, and tool workflows before users, attackers, or auditors find the failure first.

THREAT ANALYSIS

Why Pre-Production AI Red Teaming?

Most enterprise AI systems move toward production without enough adversarial testing. Automated AI red teaming makes this process repeatable, measurable, and fast enough to run before every major release.

THREAT ANALYSIS

Why Pre-Production AI Red Teaming?

Most enterprise AI systems move toward production without enough adversarial testing. Automated AI red teaming makes this process repeatable, measurable, and fast enough to run before every major release.

The attack surface expanded faster than teams can map

Enterprise AI systems now expose more entry points than manual review can track. Most teams are still catching up.

Manual red teaming doesn't scale

A team of researchers can find the obvious failures. They can't run ten thousand attack variants against every release.

Automated adversarial testing is the new standard

An attacker model generates thousands of prompts. A judge model evaluates every response. The output is a quantitative measure of where the system fails — before any user discovers it.

RED TEAMING WORKFLOW

From Adversarial Test to Security Finding

BeyondGuard runs adversarial test campaigns against your AI system in a controlled environment. The workflow follows the structure of automated AI red teaming, with one important difference: the judge is aligned with the same detection logic used in runtime protection.

RED TEAMING WORKFLOW

From Adversarial Test to Security Finding

BeyondGuard runs adversarial test campaigns against your AI system in a controlled environment. The workflow follows the structure of automated AI red teaming, with one important difference: the judge is aligned with the same detection logic used in runtime protection.

STAGE 01

Attacker Model

Generates adversarial prompts

STAGE 02

Your AI System

Responds to each prompt

STAGE 03

Judge Model

Scores pass/fail with reasoning

STAGE 04

Findings Report

Mapped to frameworks

same classifier that runs in

BeyondGuard Runtime Detection

STAGE 01

Attacker Model

Generates adversarial prompts

STAGE 02

Your AI System

Responds to each prompt

STAGE 03

Judge Model

Scores pass/fail with reasoning

STAGE 04

Findings Report

Mapped to frameworks

same classifier that runs in

BeyondGuard Runtime Detection

STAGE 01

Attacker Model

Generates adversarial prompts

STAGE 02

Your AI System

Responds to each prompt

STAGE 03

Judge Model

Scores pass/fail with reasoning

STAGE 04

Findings Report

Mapped to frameworks

THE JUDGE MODEL

The judge is the same model that runs in production

Many automated red teaming tools use a generic LLM as the judge. BeyondGuard uses the same fine-tuned classifier logic that protects production systems, so testing results translate directly into runtime security decisions.

The gap other tools ignore

Generic LLM as judge. Different training, different sensitivities, different failure modes than your production system. A jailbreak it flags might pass clean through your live filter. The findings report measures what one stock model thinks, not what your system will actually catch.

Others
Others

Generic LLM as judge

Different model in test vs. prod

Static findings report

Measures one stock model's opinion

How we close it?

The red teaming judge is the production classifier. A finding from testing is a finding your runtime layer would have caught. A pass translates directly to your live defence. And attack patterns discovered during testing feed back into continuous retraining, the test layer and the run layer get smarter together.

Fine-tuned production classifier as judge

Same model, no gap

Attack patterns feed back into retraining

Measures what your live system catches

AI ATTACK CATEGORIES

What BeyondGuard Tests For

BeyondGuard tests six categories of AI-specific attack against your actual system rather than a generic benchmark, then maps findings to the security and governance frameworks auditors already recognize.

AI ATTACK CATEGORIES

What BeyondGuard Tests For

BeyondGuard tests six categories of AI-specific attack against your actual system rather than a generic benchmark, then maps findings to the security and governance frameworks auditors already recognize.

Prompt & Chained Injections

Direct, indirect, multi-step, and encoded variants — the techniques that escape keyword-based filters.

Prompt & Chained Injections

Direct, indirect, multi-step, and encoded variants — the techniques that escape keyword-based filters.

Agentic Action Abuse

Attempts to trigger unauthorised tool calls, expand agent permissions, or hijack reasoning chains.

Agentic Action Abuse

Attempts to trigger unauthorised tool calls, expand agent permissions, or hijack reasoning chains.

RAG Context Manipulation

Knowledge poisoning, dataset contamination, and queries designed to surface unauthorised content.

RAG Context Manipulation

Knowledge poisoning, dataset contamination, and queries designed to surface unauthorised content.

Unauthorised Data Access

Training data extraction, system prompt leakage, credential disclosure, out-of-scope record retrieval — patterns that turn your AI into an inadvertent disclosure tool.

Unauthorised Data Access

Training data extraction, system prompt leakage, credential disclosure, out-of-scope record retrieval — patterns that turn your AI into an inadvertent disclosure tool.

Jailbreaks

Safety bypass, role overrides, persona attacks, policy circumvention — patterns that unlock behaviour the model was trained to refuse.

Jailbreaks

Safety bypass, role overrides, persona attacks, policy circumvention — patterns that unlock behaviour the model was trained to refuse.

Output Manipulation

Structural output corruption, function-calling exploits, downstream parser attacks — patterns that turn the AI's response into the payload.

Output Manipulation

Structural output corruption, function-calling exploits, downstream parser attacks — patterns that turn the AI's response into the payload.

BENEFITS

What you get back

FINDINGS

An actionable findings list, not just a score.

Every failure surfaces with the prompt that triggered it, the response that constituted the failure, the judge's reasoning, and the risk category it belongs to. Findings are ranked by severity, so your security team knows where to start.

EVIDENCE

A defensible
audit trail

Every campaign generates a full record of what was tested, what was found, what was remediated, and what remains. The documentation regulators now expect for AI in regulated industries, produced as a byproduct of running the test.

FRAMEWORKS

Findings mapped to the frameworks that matter.

Every finding maps to the specific control or requirement it relates to in the major AI security frameworks. So when audit time comes, the work is already done.

OWASP LLM Top 10

NIST AI RMF

MITRE ATLAS

EU AI Act

GDPR · KVKK

CLOSED LOOP

A defence that gets
sharper between tests.

The judge model that scores attacks during testing is the same fine-tuned classifier that protects your system in production. Every finding from a red teaming campaign retrains that classifier. The next campaign starts smarter than the last. So does your live defence.

Where Red Teaming Fits in the BeyondGuard Platform

Beyond Guard secures the full lifecycle of enterprise AI: design, test, and run. Red Teaming is the test layer. Beyond Gradient is the design layer, hardening prompts and validating system instructions before they reach production. The Beyond Guard runtime platform is the run layer, the AI proxy that inspects and enforces every interaction once your AI is live.

The three layers share the same security model and the same fine-tuned classification engine. A vulnerability surfaced in Red Teaming is a vulnerability the runtime layer would catch. A prompt that passes Beyond Gradient's verification has been checked against the same rules Red Teaming will exercise. Each stage informs the next. The lifecycle isn't three separate products. It's three views of one control plane.

Design Layer

Test Layer

Run Layer